Could this, from my allotment trap on 26/06/19) be Scoparia basistrigalis?
Also, from the same night, one i'm more sure is Tachystola acroxantha.
Query Scoparia basistrigalis
Re: Query Scoparia basistrigalis
Hi Clive
Tachystola acroxantha is correct.
Is anyone on the forum familiar with Scoparia basistrigalis ? Recently published distribution maps show it as being present in the county but I have yet to find a genuine example. There are none in Manchester Museum and the few I have dissected have all turned out to be Scoparia ambigualis.
Regards
Steve
Tachystola acroxantha is correct.
Is anyone on the forum familiar with Scoparia basistrigalis ? Recently published distribution maps show it as being present in the county but I have yet to find a genuine example. There are none in Manchester Museum and the few I have dissected have all turned out to be Scoparia ambigualis.
Regards
Steve
Re: Query Scoparia basistrigalis
Thanks Steve
If there are no opinions to the contrary I'd happily settle for S ambigualis. This moth did not appear particularly large for one of this group. i was led towards basistrigalis by the illustrations in Sterling & Parsons which show plain fringes for ambigualis and chequered for basistrigalis, but images online show lots of moths identified as ambigualis with fringes every bit as chequered as my moth. I found this online, but it doesn't help me greatly! http://bmg.b-i-s.org/upload/library/The_Scopariinae.pdf
Cheers
Clive
If there are no opinions to the contrary I'd happily settle for S ambigualis. This moth did not appear particularly large for one of this group. i was led towards basistrigalis by the illustrations in Sterling & Parsons which show plain fringes for ambigualis and chequered for basistrigalis, but images online show lots of moths identified as ambigualis with fringes every bit as chequered as my moth. I found this online, but it doesn't help me greatly! http://bmg.b-i-s.org/upload/library/The_Scopariinae.pdf
Cheers
Clive